Bahrami, B; Olsen, K; Latham, PE; Roepstorff, A; Rees, G; Frith, CD; (2010) Optimally Interacting Minds. SCIENCE , 329 (5995) 1081 - 1085. 10.1126/science.1185718.
Full text not available from this repository.
In everyday life, many people believe that two heads are better than one. Our ability to solve problems together appears to be fundamental to the current dominance and future survival of the human species. But are two heads really better than one? We addressed this question in the context of a collective low-level perceptual decision-making task. For two observers of nearly equal visual sensitivity, two heads were definitely better than one, provided they were given the opportunity to communicate freely, even in the absence of any feedback about decision outcomes. But for observers with very different visual sensitivities, two heads were actually worse than the better one. These seemingly discrepant patterns of group behavior can be explained by a model in which two heads are Bayes optimal under the assumption that individuals accurately communicate their level of confidence on every trial.
|Title:||Optimally Interacting Minds|
|Keywords:||POPULATION CODES, DECISION-MAKING, INTEGRATION, PERFORMANCE|
|UCL classification:||UCL > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Psychology and Language Sciences (Division of) > Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience|
UCL > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Institute of Neurology > Imaging Neuroscience
UCL > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Life Sciences > Gatsby Computational Neuroscience Unit
Archive Staff Only: edit this record