Gould, SJJ; Cox, AL; Brumby, DP; Wiseman, S; (2013) Assessing the Viability of Online Interruption Studies. In: Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Human Computation & Crowdsourcing Works-in-Progress. The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI): Palo Alto, California.
|PDF - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader|
Researchers have been collecting data online since the early days of the Internet and as technology improves, increasing numbers of traditional experiments are being run online. However, there are still questions about the kinds of experiments that work online, particularly over experiments with time-sensitive performance measures. We are interested in one time-sensitive measure specifically, the time taken to resume a task following an interruption. We ran participants through an archetypal interruption study online and in the lab. Statistical comparisons showed no significant differences in the time it took to resume following an interruption. However, there were issues with data quality that stemmed from participant confusion about the task. Our findings have implications for experiments that assess time-sensitive performance measures in tasks that require continuous attention.
|Title:||Assessing the Viability of Online Interruption Studies|
|Event:||Human Computation and Crowdsourcing (HCOMP-13)|
|Location:||Palm Springs, CA, USA|
|Dates:||November 7–9, 2013|
|Open access status:||An open access publication|
|Additional information:||© 2013 The Authors.|
|UCL classification:||UCL > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Psychology and Language Sciences (Division of) > UCL Interaction Centre|
View download statistics for this item
Activity - last month
Activity - last 12 months
Archive Staff Only: edit this record