Why the Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof hybrid functional description of VO2 phases is not correct.
Physical Review B
, Article 081101(R). 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.081101.
Download (218kB) | Preview
In contrast with recent claims that the Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof (HSE) screened hybrid functional can provide a good description of the electronic and magnetic structures of VO2 phases [Eyert, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 016401 (2011)], we show here that the HSE lowest-energy solutions for both the low-temperature monoclinic (M1) phase and the high-temperature rutile (R) phase, which are obtained upon inclusion of spin polarization, are at odds with experimental observations. For the M1 phase the ground state is (but should not be) magnetic, while the ground state of the R phase, which is also spin polarized, is not (but should be) metallic. The energy difference between the low-temperature and high-temperature phases has strong discrepancies with the experimental latent heat.
|Title:||Why the Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof hybrid functional description of VO2 phases is not correct|
|Open access status:||An open access version is available from UCL Discovery|
|Additional information:||© 2012 American Physical Society|
|UCL classification:||UCL > School of BEAMS
UCL > School of BEAMS > Faculty of Maths and Physical Sciences
Archive Staff Only