UCL logo

UCL Discovery

UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

A comparison of two algorithms for determining ranked assignments with application to multitarget tracking and motion correspondence

Cox, IJ; Miller, ML; Danchick, R; Newnam, GE; (1997) A comparison of two algorithms for determining ranked assignments with application to multitarget tracking and motion correspondence. IEEE T AERO ELEC SYS , 33 (1) 295 - 301.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Recently, it has become clear that determining a ranked set of assignments allows computation of very good approximations to the data association problem Several algorithms have been proposed but only two return the k-best assignments in reasonable time. One is Danchick and Newnams' [1] algorithm, which is based on the recognition that determining the best assignment is a classical assignment problem, and that determining a ranked set of assignments may be accomplished by solving a series of modified copies of the initial assignment problem. The other algorithm is originally due to Murty [2] and was most recently described by [3] within the context of multitarget tracking. We evaluate the two algorithm using randomly generated data and data obtained from an electrooptical sensor simulation in which 90 missiles are launched. These evaluations show that Murty's algorithm perform significantly better in all scenarios. We show the relationship between the two algorithm and how Danchick and Newnans' algorithm can be very easily modified to Murty's algorithm Experimental results using Murty's algorithm suggest that a solution to the real-time data association problem is now feasible.

Type:Article
Title:A comparison of two algorithms for determining ranked assignments with application to multitarget tracking and motion correspondence
UCL classification:UCL > School of BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > Computer Science

Archive Staff Only: edit this record