UCL logo

UCL Discovery

UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

A multicenter evaluation of absorbent products for children with incontinence and disabilities.

Macaulay, M; Pettersson, L; Fader, M; Brooks, R; Cottenden, A; (2004) A multicenter evaluation of absorbent products for children with incontinence and disabilities. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs , 31 (4) pp. 235-244.

Full text not available from this repository.


OBJECTIVE: To evaluate all disposable pull-up-style pads (pull-ups) designed for children with learning and or physical disabilities and compare these with a representative sample of disposable diapers (diapers). DESIGN: A multicenter randomized crossover trial where all children evaluated each product. SETTING AND CHILDREN: A total of 61 community dwelling children with disabilities were recruited from 5 areas throughout the United Kingdom. Families were invited by letter to participate through their local clinical nurse specialist for continence care. INSTRUMENTS: Instruments used included a range of questionnaires (product performance, design performance, and design preference questionnaires) and pad weight and leakage diaries. METHODS: The children tested 10 products (5 pull-ups and 5 diapers) for up to 1 week per product both at home and at school. Caregivers (parents and guardians) completed the questionnaires after evaluation of individual products and design groups had been completed. They recorded wet product weights and scored pad leakage at each pad change. School staff completed an abbreviated product performance questionnaire for each product. RESULTS: There was little difference in the overall performance of the pull-ups compared with the diapers. In the pull-up group, one product performed significantly worse than the others for some performance aspects. Pull-ups worked particularly well for children able to assist with toileting and pad changes. Diapers were liked for ease of changing if the child used calipers, adapted footwear, or trousers. Diapers were more popular than pull-ups for night use, when greater absorbency was required. Neither design performed differently for school or home use. Most caregivers expressed a preference for diapers or pull-ups based on a range of individual needs, for example, level of independence in toileting, discreteness in pad change, fit, and product appearance. CONCLUSIONS: Diapers and pull-ups have different strengths and limitations, and both meet the specific needs of individual children. Although pull-ups are more expensive than diapers, their use is justified if based on a thorough assessment of individual need.

Type: Article
Title: A multicenter evaluation of absorbent products for children with incontinence and disabilities.
Location: United States
Keywords: Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Cross-Over Studies, Diapers, Infant, Disabled Children, Disposable Equipment, Fecal Incontinence, Female, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Urinary Incontinence
URI: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1346969
Downloads since deposit
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item