UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

The CORONIS Trial. International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: A randomised fractional, factorial trial

Brocklehurst, P; Abalos, E; Addo, V; Sharma, JB; Matthews, J; Oyieke, J; Naz Masood, S; ... CORONIS Trial Collaborative Group, The; + view all (2007) The CORONIS Trial. International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: A randomised fractional, factorial trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth , 7 , Article 24. 10.1186/1471-2393-7-24. Green open access

[thumbnail of 1471-2393-7-24.pdf]
Preview
PDF
1471-2393-7-24.pdf
Available under License : See the attached licence file.

Download (338kB)

Abstract

Background: Caesarean section is one of the most commonly performed operations on women throughout the world. Rates have increased in recent years – about 20–25% in many developed countries. Rates in other parts of the world vary widely. A variety of surgical techniques for all elements of the caesarean section operation are in use. Many have not yet been rigorously evaluated in randomised controlled trials, and it is not known whether any are associated with better outcomes for women and babies. Because huge numbers of women undergo caesarean section, even small differences in post-operative morbidity rates between techniques could translate into improved health for substantial numbers of women, and significant cost savings. Design: CORONIS is a multicentre, fractional, factorial randomised controlled trial and will be conducted in centres in Argentina, Ghana, India, Kenya, Pakistan and Sudan. Women are eligible if they are undergoing their first or second caesarean section through a transverse abdominal incision. Five comparisons will be carried out in one trial, using a 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 2 fractional factorial design. This design has rarely been used, but is appropriate for the evaluation of several procedures which will be used together in clinical practice. The interventions are: • Blunt versus sharp abdominal entry • Exteriorisation of the uterus for repair versus intra-abdominal repair • Single versus double layer closure of the uterus • Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum (pelvic and parietal) • Chromic catgut versus Polyglactin-910 for uterine repair The primary outcome is death or maternal infectious morbidity (one or more of the following: antibiotic use for maternal febrile morbidity during postnatal hospital stay, antibiotic use for endometritis, wound infection or peritonitis) or further operative procedures; or blood transfusion. The sample size required is 15,000 women in total; at least 7,586 women in each comparison. Discussion: Improvements in health from optimising caesarean section techniques are likely to be more significant in developing countries, because the rates of postoperative morbidity in these countries tend to be higher. More women could therefore benefit from improvements in techniques. Trial registration: The CORONIS Trial is registered in the Current Controlled Trials registry. ISCRTN31089967.

Type: Article
Title: The CORONIS Trial. International study of caesarean section surgical techniques: A randomised fractional, factorial trial
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-7-24
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-7-24
Language: English
Additional information: © 2007 The CORONIS Trial Collaborative Group; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL EGA Institute for Womens Health
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1336332
Downloads since deposit
256Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item