UCL logo

UCL Discovery

UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Is it still possible to extend TCP?

Honda, M; Nishida, Y; Raiciu, C; Greenhalgh, A; Handley, M; Tokuda, H; (2011) Is it still possible to extend TCP? In: (pp. pp. 181-194).

Full text not available from this repository.


We've known for a while that the Internet has ossified as a result of the race to optimize existing applications or enhance security. NATs, performance-enhancing-proxies,firewalls and traffic normalizers are only a few of the middleboxes that are deployed in the network and look beyond the IP header to do their job. IP itself can't be extended because "IP options are not an option". Is the same true for TCP? In this paper we develop a measurement methodology for evaluating middlebox behavior relating to TCP extensions and present the results of measurements conducted from multiple vantage points. The short answer is that we can still extend TCP, but extensions' design is very constrained as it needs to take into account prevalent middlebox behaviors. For instance, absolute sequence numbers cannot be embedded in options, as middleboxes can rewrite ISN and preserve undefined options. Sequence numbering also must be consistent for a TCP connection, because many middleboxes only allow through contiguous flows. We used these findings to analyze three proposed extensions to TCP. We find that MPTCP is likely to work correctly in the Internet or fallback to regular TCP. TcpCrypt seems ready to be deployed, however it is fragile if resegmentation does happen - -for instance with hardware offload. Finally, TCP extended options in its current form is not safe to deploy. © 2011 ACM.

Type: Proceedings paper
Title: Is it still possible to extend TCP?
ISBN-13: 9781450310130
DOI: 10.1145/2068816.2068834
URI: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/1331342
Downloads since deposit
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item