UCL logo

UCL Discovery

UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

A comparison of woven versus nonwoven polypropylene (PP) and expanded versus condensed polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) on their intraperitoneal incorporation and adhesion formation.

Raptis, DA; Vichova, B; Breza, J; Skipworth, J; Barker, S; (2011) A comparison of woven versus nonwoven polypropylene (PP) and expanded versus condensed polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) on their intraperitoneal incorporation and adhesion formation. J Surg Res , 169 (1) 1 - 6. 10.1016/j.jss.2009.12.014.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

To compare known and novel synthetic materials useful for incisional hernia repair and to test independently, whether they justify common perceptions related to their use.

Type:Article
Title:A comparison of woven versus nonwoven polypropylene (PP) and expanded versus condensed polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) on their intraperitoneal incorporation and adhesion formation.
Location:United States
DOI:10.1016/j.jss.2009.12.014
Language:English
Keywords:Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Female, Herniorrhaphy, Male, Materials Testing, Models, Animal, Peritoneal Cavity, Polypropylenes, Polytetrafluoroethylene, Postoperative Complications, Surgical Mesh, Swine, Tissue Adhesions
UCL classification:UCL > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Medical Sciences > Surgery and Interventional Science (Division of)

Archive Staff Only: edit this record