UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

A Review of Tooth Implantation Among Rhynchocephalians (Lepidosauria)

Jenkins, KM; Jones, MEH; Zikmund, T; Boyde, A; Daza, JD; (2017) A Review of Tooth Implantation Among Rhynchocephalians (Lepidosauria). [Review]. Journal of Herpetology , 51 (3) pp. 300-306. 10.1670/16-146.

[thumbnail of Jenkins_Review of Tooth Implantation Among Rhynchocephalians.pdf] Text
Jenkins_Review of Tooth Implantation Among Rhynchocephalians.pdf - Accepted Version
Access restricted to UCL open access staff

Download (948kB)

Abstract

Acrodont dental implantation is widely considered an important character for referring fossil material to Rhynchocephalia. Under its purest definition, acrodonty involves teeth being attached to the crest of the marginal bones without roots. A similar mode of tooth attachment is known in a variety of other reptile groups including some squamates and procolophonids. There is a lack of consensus on the definition of acrodont, how best to characterize tooth implantation, and the relationship between implantation and tooth replacement. Rhynchocephalians already are known to demonstrate variation in their mode of tooth attachment. Unambiguous acrodonty associated with little or no tooth replacement has been associated with Sphenodon, but it appears to have been the most widespread condition for much of the Mesozoic. A form of pleurodonty, where teeth are attached to the inside of the jaw bone with shallow roots, appears to be the plesiomorphic condition for both Lepidosauria and Rhynchocephalia. Jaws with anterior pleurodont teeth and posterior acrodont teeth appear to have been common for early rhynchocephalians in the Triassic, and Ankylosphenodon from the early Cretaceous of Mexico demonstrates that at least some later rhynchocephalians possessed continually replacing dentition, but identification of this trait requires inspection of internal anatomy. When cross-sections of teeth are unavailable or the lingual view of jaws is obscured, one cannot be 100% confident of acrodont implantation, and “acrodonty” should not be used as a single character to refer incomplete jaw material to Rhynchocephalia. Tooth implantation is a component that was highly variable in a once-diverse reptile group.

Type: Article
Title: A Review of Tooth Implantation Among Rhynchocephalians (Lepidosauria)
DOI: 10.1670/16-146
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1670/16-146
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: dentition; acrodont; pleurodont; fossil; squamate
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Life Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Life Sciences > Div of Biosciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Life Sciences > Div of Biosciences > Cell and Developmental Biology
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10071652
Downloads since deposit
1Download
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item