UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Measuring longitudinal cognition: Individual tests versus composites

Jonaitis, EM; Koscik, RL; Clark, LR; Ma, Y; Betthauser, TJ; Berman, SE; Allison, SL; ... Johnson, SC; + view all (2019) Measuring longitudinal cognition: Individual tests versus composites. Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring , 11 pp. 74-84. 10.1016/j.dadm.2018.11.006. Green open access

[thumbnail of Zetterberg_Measuring longitudinal cognition. Individual tests versus composites_VoR.pdf]
Preview
Text
Zetterberg_Measuring longitudinal cognition. Individual tests versus composites_VoR.pdf - Published Version

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Longitudinal cohort studies of cognitive aging must confront several sources of within-person variability in scores. In this article, we compare several neuropsychological measures in terms of longitudinal error variance and relationships with biomarker-assessed brain amyloidosis (Aβ). METHODS: Analyses used data from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer's Prevention. We quantified within-person longitudinal variability and age-related trajectories for several global and domain-specific composites and their constituent scores. For a subset with cerebrospinal fluid or amyloid positron emission tomography measures, we examined how Aβ modified cognitive trajectories. RESULTS: Global and theoretically derived composites exhibited lower intraindividual variability and stronger age × Aβ interactions than did empirically derived composites or raw scores from single tests. For example, the theoretical executive function outperformed other executive function scores on both metrics. DISCUSSION: These results reinforce the need for careful selection of cognitive outcomes in study design, and support the emerging consensus favoring composites over single-test measures.

Type: Article
Title: Measuring longitudinal cognition: Individual tests versus composites
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1016/j.dadm.2018.11.006
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dadm.2018.11.006
Language: English
Additional information: © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the Alzheimer’s Association. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Keywords: Biostatistics, Longitudinal data analysis, Cognitive aging, Neuropsychological tests, Composite scores, Intraindividual variability
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology > Neurodegenerative Diseases
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10068423
Downloads since deposit
126Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item