UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

'What's cooking?' A comparison of an activity-oriented and a table-top programme of therapy on the language performance of people with aphasia

Bruce, C; Newton, C; (2019) 'What's cooking?' A comparison of an activity-oriented and a table-top programme of therapy on the language performance of people with aphasia. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders , 54 (3) pp. 430-443. 10.1111/1460-6984.12447. Green open access

[thumbnail of What's cooking ms_accepted.pdf]
Preview
Text
What's cooking ms_accepted.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (826kB) | Preview

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Many people with aphasia have word‐finding difficulties, with some showing particular difficulties with verbs. Picture‐naming therapy is often used to improve naming, but gains are usually limited to therapy items and do not transfer to conversation. Therapy where words are produced in sentences and in real‐life activities may be more effective. AIMS: The current pilot study investigated whether an activity‐oriented therapy approach would be accepted and viable if implemented in a community setting, and whether communicating whilst cooking was more beneficial than using paper‐based activities. If successful, it would be expected that verb production would improve in structured and unstructured tasks in both naming and narrative tasks. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: The study employed a case‐series repeated‐measures design, with testing of treated and control items. Seven adults with anomia participated, although only five completed the full programme. Participants were divided into two groups and each group completed both treatments, but in different orders. Each treatment was employed for six 2‐h sessions over a 3‐week period. OUTCOME AND RESULTS: Naming of both treated and untreated verbs showed a statistically significant improvement following both treatments and this continued into the maintenance phase. There was a numerical but not statistically significant gain in the variety of verbs used in spoken narratives. Participants predominantly chose positive terms to describe their experience of the programme, but did not prefer one therapy over the other. CONCLSUIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Preliminary findings suggest that an activity‐oriented therapy approach, whether it involves carrying out tasks or paper‐based activities, can result in clinically meaningful improvements for people with chronic aphasia. Further research using a randomized control trial is required to determine whether cooking therapy alone is effective.

Type: Article
Title: 'What's cooking?' A comparison of an activity-oriented and a table-top programme of therapy on the language performance of people with aphasia
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12447
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12447
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: aphasia, intervention, activity oriented, naming
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Language and Cognition
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10063827
Downloads since deposit
254Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item