UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

PEPtalk2: Results of a pilot randomised controlled trial to compare VZIG and aciclovir as postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) against chickenpox in children with cancer

Bate, J; Baker, S; Breuer, J; Chisholm, JC; Gray, J; Hambleton, S; Houlton, A; ... Heath, PT; + view all (2019) PEPtalk2: Results of a pilot randomised controlled trial to compare VZIG and aciclovir as postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) against chickenpox in children with cancer. Archives of Disease in Childhood , 104 (1) pp. 25-29. 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314212. Green open access

[thumbnail of PEPtalk 2 paper ADC.pdf]
Preview
Text
PEPtalk 2 paper ADC.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (440kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective: To determine the likely rate of patient randomisation and to facilitate sample size calculation for a full-scale phase III trial of varicella zoster immunoglobulin (VZIG) and aciclovir as postexposure prophylaxis against chickenpox in children with cancer. // Design: Multicentre pilot randomised controlled trial of VZIG and oral aciclovir. // Setting: England, UK. // Patients: Children under 16 years of age with a diagnosis of cancer: currently or within 6 months of receiving cancer treatment and with negative varicella zoster virus (VZV) serostatus at diagnosis or within the last 3 months. // Interventions: Study participants who have a significant VZV exposure were randomised to receive PEP in the form of VZIG or aciclovir after the exposure. // Main outcome measures: Number of patients registered and randomised within 12 months of the trial opening to recruitment and incidence of breakthrough varicella. // Results: The study opened in six sites over a 13-month period. 482 patients were screened for eligibility, 32 patients were registered and 3 patients were randomised following VZV exposure. All three were randomised to receive aciclovir and there were no cases of breakthrough varicella. // Conclusions: Given the limited recruitment to the PEPtalk2 pilot, it is unlikely that the necessary sample size would be achievable using this strategy in a full-scale trial. The study identified factors that could be used to modify the design of a definitive trial but other options for defining the best means to protect such children against VZV should be explored. // Trial registration number: ISRCTN48257441, EudraCT number: 2013-001332-22, sponsor: University of Birmingham.

Type: Article
Title: PEPtalk2: Results of a pilot randomised controlled trial to compare VZIG and aciclovir as postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) against chickenpox in children with cancer
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-314212
Publisher version: https://adc.bmj.com/content/early/2018/05/05/archd...
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
UCL classification: UCL
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Population Health Sciences > UCL GOS Institute of Child Health > Infection, Immunity and Inflammation Dept
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10060188
Downloads since deposit
135Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item