UCL logo

UCL Discovery

UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Asking More of Qualitative Synthesis: A Response to Sally Thorne

Britten, N; Garside, R; Pope, C; Frost, J; Cooper, C; (2017) Asking More of Qualitative Synthesis: A Response to Sally Thorne. Qualitative Health Research , 27 (9) pp. 1370-1376. 10.1177/1049732317709010. Green open access

[img]
Preview
Text
Britten_Asking more of qualitative synthesis AAM.pdf - ["content_typename_Accepted version" not defined]

Download (335kB) | Preview

Abstract

We continue the conversation initiated by Sally Thorne’s observations about “metasynthetic madness.” We note that the variety of labels used to describe qualitative syntheses often reflect authors’ disciplines and geographical locations. The purpose of systematic literature searching is to redress authors’ lack of citation of relevant earlier work and to reassure policy makers that qualitative syntheses are systematic and transparent. There is clearly a need to develop other methods of searching to supplement electronic searches. If searches produce large numbers of articles, sampling strategies may be needed to choose which articles to synthesize. The quality of any synthesis is dependent on the quality of the primary articles; both primary research and qualitative synthesis need to move beyond description and toward theory and explanation. Synthesizers need to pay attention to those articles which do not seem to fit their emerging analysis if they are to avoid stifling new ideas.

Type: Article
Title: Asking More of Qualitative Synthesis: A Response to Sally Thorne
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1177/1049732317709010
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1049732317709010
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: qualitative research, qualitative synthesis, literature searching, systematic review, metasynthesis, qualitative, UK
UCL classification: UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Life and Medical Sciences > Faculty of Brain Sciences > Div of Psychology and Lang Sciences > Clinical, Edu and Hlth Psychology
URI: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10059556
Downloads since deposit
59Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item