UCL logo

UCL Discovery

UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

GP leadership in clinical commissioning groups: a qualitative multi-case study approach across England

Marshall, M; Holti, R; Hartley, J; Matharu, T; Storey, J; (2018) GP leadership in clinical commissioning groups: a qualitative multi-case study approach across England. British Journal of General Practice , 68 (671) e427-e432. 10.3399/bjgp18X696197.

[img] Text
Marshall_GPs as leaders of service redesign in CCGs FINAL 16-10-17 GP leadership in CCGs a qualitative multi case.pdf - ["content_typename_Accepted version" not defined]
Access restricted to UCL open access staff until 1 June 2019.

Download (350kB)


BACKGROUND: Clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) were established in England in 2013 to encourage GPs to exert greater influence over the processes of service improvement and redesign in the NHS. Little is known about the extent and the ways in which GPs have assumed these leadership roles. AIM: To explore the nature of clinical leadership of GPs in CCGs, and to examine the enablers and barriers to implementing a policy of clinical leadership in the NHS. DESIGN AND SETTING: A qualitative multi-case study approach in six localities across England. The case studies were purposefully sampled to represent different geographical localities and population demographics, and for their commitment to redesigning specified clinical or service areas. METHOD: Data were collected from the case study CCGs and their partner organisations using a review of relevant documents, semi-structured individual or group interviews, and observations of key meetings. The data were analysed thematically and informed by relevant theories. RESULTS: GPs prefer a collaborative style of leadership that may be unlikely to produce rapid or radical change. Leadership activities are required at all levels in the system from strategy to frontline delivery, and the leadership behaviours of GPs who are not titular leaders are as important as formal leadership roles. A new alliance is emerging between clinicians and managers that draws on their different skillsets and creates new common interests. The uncertain policy environment in the English NHS is impacting on the willingness and the focus of GP leaders. CONCLUSION: GPs are making an important contribution as leaders of health service improvement and redesign but there are significant professional and political barriers to them optimising a leadership role.

Type: Article
Title: GP leadership in clinical commissioning groups: a qualitative multi-case study approach across England
Location: England
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18X696197
Publisher version: http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X696197
Language: English
Additional information: This version is the author accepted manuscript. For information on re-use, please refer to the publisher’s terms and conditions.
Keywords: clinical commissioning groups, clinical leadership, general practice, health service redesign, leadership, qualitative research
URI: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10050002
Downloads since deposit
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item