UCL logo

UCL Discovery

UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Quantitative assessment of the susceptibility artefact and its interaction with motion in diffusion MRI

Graham, MS; Drobnjak, I; Jenkinson, M; Zhang, H; (2017) Quantitative assessment of the susceptibility artefact and its interaction with motion in diffusion MRI. PLoS ONE , 12 (10) , Article e0185647. 10.1371/journal.pone.0185647. Green open access

[img]
Preview
Text (Published article)
Graham_Quantitative_assessment_susceptibility.pdf - ["content_typename_Published version" not defined]

Download (8MB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (Appendix)
Graham_Quantitative_assessment_susceptibilit_S1.pdf

Download (778kB) | Preview
[img]
Preview
Text (Supplementary table)
Graham_Quantitative_assessment_susceptibilit_S2.pdf

Download (81kB) | Preview

Abstract

In this paper we evaluate the three main methods for correcting the susceptibility-induced artefact in diffusion-weighted magnetic-resonance (DW-MR) data, and assess how correction is affected by the susceptibility field’s interaction with motion. The susceptibility artefact adversely impacts analysis performed on the data and is typically corrected in post-processing. Correction strategies involve either registration to a structural image, the application of an acquired field-map or the use of additional images acquired with different phase-encoding. Unfortunately, the choice of which method to use is made difficult by the absence of any systematic comparisons of them. In this work we quantitatively evaluate these methods, by extending and employing a recently proposed framework that allows for the simulation of realistic DW-MR datasets with artefacts. Our analysis separately evaluates the ability for methods to correct for geometric distortions and to recover lost information in regions of signal compression. In terms of geometric distortions, we find that registration-based methods offer the poorest correction. Field-mapping techniques are better, but are influenced by noise and partial volume effects, whilst multiple phase-encode methods performed best. We use our simulations to validate a popular surrogate metric of correction quality, the comparison of corrected data acquired with AP and LR phase-encoding, and apply this surrogate to real datasets. Furthermore, we demonstrate that failing to account for the interaction of the susceptibility field with head movement leads to increased errors when analysing DW-MR data. None of the commonly used post-processing methods account for this interaction, and we suggest this may be a valuable area for future methods development.

Type: Article
Title: Quantitative assessment of the susceptibility artefact and its interaction with motion in diffusion MRI
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185647
Publisher version: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185647
Language: English
Additional information: Copyright © 2017 Graham et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
UCL classification: UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science
UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > UCL BEAMS > Faculty of Engineering Science > Dept of Computer Science
URI: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10024442
Downloads since deposit
94Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item