UCL Discovery
UCL home » Library Services » Electronic resources » UCL Discovery

Using qualitative evidence on patients' views to help understand variation in effectiveness of complex interventions : A qualitative comparative analysis

Candy, Bridget; King, Michael; Jones, Louise; Oliver, Sandy; (2013) Using qualitative evidence on patients' views to help understand variation in effectiveness of complex interventions : A qualitative comparative analysis. Trials , 14 (179) pp. 1-10. Green open access

[thumbnail of Candy_et_al_2013.pdf]
Preview
Text
Candy_et_al_2013.pdf - Submitted Version

Download (319kB) | Preview

Abstract

(provisional) Background Complex healthcare interventions consist of multiple components which may vary in trials conducted in different populations and contexts. Pooling evidence from trials in a systematic review is challenging because it is unclear which components are needed for effectiveness. The potential is recognised for using recipients' views to explore why some complex interventions are effective and others are not. Methods to maximise this potential are poorly developed. Methods We used a novel approach to explore how patients' views may explain the disparity in effectiveness of complex interventions. We used qualitative comparative analysis to explore agreement between qualitative syntheses of data on patients' views and evidence from trialed interventions to increase adherence to treatments. We first populated data matrices to reflect whether the content of each trialed intervention could be matched with suggestions arising from patients' views. We then used qualitative comparative analysis software to identify, by a process of elimination, the smallest number of configurations (patterns) of components that corresponded with patients' suggestions and accounted for whether each intervention was effective or ineffective. Results We found suggestions by patients were poorly represented in interventions. Qualitative comparative analysis identified particular combinations of components corresponding with patients' suggestions and with whether an intervention was effective or ineffective. Six patterns were identified for an effective and four for an ineffective intervention. Two types of patterns arose for the effective interventions, one being didactic (providing clear information or instruction) and the other interactive (focusing on personal risk factors). Conclusions Our analysis highlights how data on patients' views has the potential to identify key components across trials of complex interventions or inform the content of new interventions to be trialed.

Type: Article
Title: Using qualitative evidence on patients' views to help understand variation in effectiveness of complex interventions : A qualitative comparative analysis
Open access status: An open access version is available from UCL Discovery
Language: English
Keywords: qualitative comparative analysis, complex interventions, research synthesis
UCL classification: UCL > Provost and Vice Provost Offices > School of Education > UCL Institute of Education
URI: https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10017419
Downloads since deposit
15Downloads
Download activity - last month
Download activity - last 12 months
Downloads by country - last 12 months

Archive Staff Only

View Item View Item